Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 6, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Bees

— Affirming.

The appellant, Jim Hicks, has been convicted of the crime.of willful murder, and his punishment fixed at life imprisonment. Three grounds are relied upon for reversal of the judgment: (1) The verdict is excessive and not sustained by the evidence; (2) incompetent evidence was admitted over appellant’s objection; and (3) the instruction on willful murder was not authorized by the evidence.

Appellant stabbed and killed John 'Mullins on a Sunday afternoon between 5 and 6 p. m. Hicks and Mul lins were close neighbors, and lived in Low Ash, a small…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gus Dattilo Fruit Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Jones v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Trumbull v. TrumbullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Lewis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  5. Fayman v. Franklin Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API