Hicks v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Bees
— Affirming.
The appellant, Jim Hicks, has been convicted of the crime.of willful murder, and his punishment fixed at life imprisonment. Three grounds are relied upon for reversal of the judgment: (1) The verdict is excessive and not sustained by the evidence; (2) incompetent evidence was admitted over appellant’s objection; and (3) the instruction on willful murder was not authorized by the evidence.
Appellant stabbed and killed John 'Mullins on a Sunday afternoon between 5 and 6 p. m. Hicks and Mul lins were close neighbors, and lived in Low Ash, a small…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gus Dattilo Fruit Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Jones v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Trumbull v. TrumbullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Lewis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
- Fayman v. Franklin Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.