Legal Opinion

Gus Dattilo Fruit Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 27, 1931PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Affirming.

The appellant, Gus Dattilo, doing business as Gus Dattilo Fruit Company, sued the appellee, the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, for damages to a.shipment of bananas charged to have been caused by rough handling. From an adverse judgment on the verdict of a jury, he appeals.

The Moorehead Inspection Bureau, according to the evidence, is an independent organization maintained for the inspection of shipments of perishable merchandise, and, as stated on this trial, is recognized by both carriers and shippers as neutral and impartial.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Baskett, Nichols & Norment v. RudyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Givens v. Pierson's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Liberty Chair Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Company v. DaviessCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Ward v. MusicCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  3. Mussinon's Administrator v. HerrinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Duff v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Time Finance Company v. BeckmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API