Legal Opinion

Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1935No. L-487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, a' New York corporation, manufactures for' sale automobiles, trucks, and service parts therefor. On May 13, 1920, it filed its final income tax return for the calendar year 1919. The hooks of the corporation were kept upon an accrual basis, and to ascertain taxable income inventories were essential. This suit is for recovery of an alleged overpayment of income taxes for 1919 due to a refusal of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to permit the plaintiff to include in its inventory for 1919 certain tool steel at its market value.

The defendant relies upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heiner v. TindleSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Tefft v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  4. Bourne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  5. J. E. Ervine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Illinois Cereal Mills, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. United States ex rel. Botany Worsted Mills v. HelveringDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  3. J. E. Ervine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  4. J. E. Ervine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Pierce-Arrow Motor Corp. v. MealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API