Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Botany Worsted Mills v. Helvering

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 8, 1937No. 6561PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGroner, J.

An appeal from a final judgment of the District Court. In March, 1933, petitioner applied in the court below for a mandamus to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue commanding him to act upon petitioner’s claim for refund of its income and profits taxes for the year -1919 on the merits, and to decide whether petitioner is entitled to special relief under sections 327 and 328 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057, 1093) and, if he should find that it is entitled to special relief, to certify to the proper authorities the overpayment ascertained to be due.

There was a prayer for other relief…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Blair v. Oesterlein MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Borg-Warner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API