Legal Opinion

Daubert v. Lindsay Unified School District

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2014No. 12-16252PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we consider whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12165 (ADA), requires a public entity to structurally alter public seating at a high school football field, where the seating was constructed prior to the ADA’s enactment, and the school district provides program access to individuals who use wheelchairs. We conclude that Title II imposes no such burden, and we therefore affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Lindsay Unified School District (School District).

FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bias v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Parker v. Universidad De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Zach Hillesheim v. Myron's Cards and Gifts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Melanie Davis v. Anthony, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Ivana Kirola v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Shellie Ellison v. USPSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  5. Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API