Arnold v. At & T, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs are landline telephone customers of the defendants. Their claims arise out of and relate to charges on their telephone bills which they allege they were billed for, and paid for, products or services from third parties that they did not order or authorize. Specifically, they allege that they incurred unauthorized prepaid services charges for services that came under the names of Enhanced Services, HBS Billing Services, and/or ILD Teleservices. They have filed a putative nationwide class action complaint for damages against…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodbye Vanilla, LLC v. Aimia Proprietary Loyalty U.S. Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Brothers and Sisters in Christ, LLC v. Zazzle, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Corey Spillman, Tammy Spillman, K.S., and M.S., minors, by and through their Next Friend Corey Spillman v. Sun Auto Tire & Service, Inc., d/b/a Plaza Tire ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
- Warren v. Millennia Housing Management LTDDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024