Legal Opinion
City of Palmer v. Anderson
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1979No. 4118PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The City of Palmer appeals from a jury finding that it breached its contract with the appellee, Dale Anderson, doing business as Anderson Garbage Service. Damages were awarded in the amount of $24,424.00.
Anderson purchased his garbage business from his father in 1973. At that time the business included a sanitary landfill operation, garbage collecting equipment, a certificate from the Alaska Public Utilities Commission authorizing garbage and refuse collection from the area immediately outside the city limits of Palmer, and an oral agreement with the City of Palmer…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Bailey v. LenordAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Sawyers v. FMA Leasing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- Geolar, Inc. v. Gilbert/Commonwealth Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.