Legal Opinion

Herzfeld v. Reinach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, Felix Herzfeld and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court-in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 8th day of March, 1899, upon the report of a referee dismissing the complaint upon the merits.

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, J. :

This action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due the plaintiffs, as surviving members of the firm of Herzfeld & Co., in making purchases and sales of stock for the defendant. The answer is substantially a general denial of the cause of action alleged in the complaint, and it also contains a counterclaim for alleged disobedience of the defendant’s orders in making the purchases and sales. The issues involved were sent to a referee to hear and determine, who after trial dismissed the complaint upon the merits, with costs, and the plaintiffs have appealed. During…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sharpe v. . FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. SiracoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Rickert v. PollockAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  3. Hillman v. De RosaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  4. Harris v. ReingoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Maslon v. SprickerhoffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API