Legal Opinion
Smith v. Reynolds
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1968No. Civ. A. 42419PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
This class action challenges the constitutional validity of a Pennsylvania statutory provision which requires applicants for public welfare to have resided in the State for a period of one year immediately preceding the date of application for assistance. The members of the class are citizens of the United States and bona fide residents of Pennsylvania who would otherwise be qualified for public assistance but for the fact that they have not resided in Pennsylvania for a period of one year. We hold that the residence requirement, as presently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Snell v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Westberry v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1980
- Harrell v. TobrinerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
- Allen v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.