Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Tobriner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 1968No. Civ. A. 1497-67, 1579-67, and 1749-67PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs and intervenor,1 all now to be referred to as plaintiffs, in slightly differing factual situations applied for public assistance under the District of Columbia Public Assistance Act of 1962, Title 3, Chapter 2, D.C.Code (1967). Defendants, who have official responsibility in the matter, denied the applications. The sole ground of denial was that plaintiffs and the minor children on whose behalf they sought aid had not complied with the residence requirements of D.C.Code § 3-203 (a) (b) (1967), set forth in the margin insofar as pertinent to this case,2…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Snell v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Shifrin v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Westberry v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.