Legal Opinion
In Re: Craig Clinton Rominger and Heidi Kay Rominger
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 6, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02143Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 In Re: CRAIG CLINTON ROMINGER and CASE NO. 2:25-cv-02143-LK 11 HEIDI KAY ROMINGER ORDER DISMISSING CASE 12 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on its March 18, 2026 order requiring the Romingers 15 to show cause within 14 days why the Court should not dismiss their appeal for failure to prosecute. 16 Dkt. No. 17. For the reasons set forth below, the Court dismisses this matter. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 On March 18, 2026, the Court issued an order granting Appellee’s Motion for Order to 19 Show Cause…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Olsen v. MapesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.