Legal Opinion
Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. Finesilver, Etc., State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1977No. 76-1618, 76-1632, 76-1633 and 76-1710PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
The consolidated cases, one a petition for writ of mandamus and three direct appeals, all relate to pre-trial discovery orders entered by the district court. Petitioner and appellant, Arthur Andersen & Co., objected to the production of certain documents on the ground that production would violate the non-disclosure laws of Switzerland. The district court overruled the objections. We dismiss the appeals and deny the writ of mandamus.
In the Spring of 1970, the State of Ohio loaned King Resources Company, KRC, $8,000,000. In August, 1971, an involuntary petition…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Virgil Cochran v. Francis J. Birkel, Virginia Hager, Bettie Klontz, and Kathy Rubens, All IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Venen v. SweetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John Hitchmon, A/K/A John Ashanti, and Jessie Lee Fussell, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. FinesilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.