Legal Opinion
Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 6, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1301PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Nanko Shipping Guinea seeks reconsideration of the dismissal of this casé. It does not assert new evidence or a change in law, but argues that the Court committed clear error and that reversal is required to avoid' manifest injustice. Because there was no error or injustice, the motion will bé deniéd.
I. FACTS 1
In 1963, the Republic of Guinea (Guinea) and Harvey Aluminum Company of Delaware (Halco) formed the Compagnie des Bauxites de Guiñee (CBG) and entered into the CBG Convention, a contract for the development of bauxite mining,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Magloire Etoh v. Fannie MaeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Fraenkel v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bishop v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Fraenkel v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Grant v. MnuchinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.