Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 26, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-2623Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-2623 (TNM) THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER The Court recently dismissed Paul Bishop’s Amended Complaint because it failed to state a plausible discrimination claim. Mem. Op., ECF No. 26. Now Bishop seeks reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Pl.’s Mot. for Recons., ECF No. 29. He generally claims that the dismissal constituted an “abuse of discretion” that was “contrary to the evidence.” Id. at 1. 1 To support this claim, Bishop…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Edgewater Hospital, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Richard Figueroa v. Michael PompeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- W.C. & A.N. Miller Companies v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.