Legal Opinion
Adamy v. Ziriakus
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1998PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
Central to these cross appeals is the question whether there was evidence to support the jury’s verdict that defendant T.G.I. Friday’s served alcohol to a customer while he was “visibly intoxicated” (General Obligations Law § 11-101; Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 [2]) and was therefore liable for fatal injuries suffered by plaintiff’s decedent in a car accident. Concluding that the verdict cannot as a matter of law be disturbed, and that there is no reversible error in any of the other issues raised by the parties, we affirm the Appellate Division…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. LaddNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Ramos v. Howard Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Krieger v. McDonald's Restaurant of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Erbstein v. SavasatitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Leavy v. MerriamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Beaulieu v. the Aube Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.