Legal Opinion
Hirschfeld v. Hogan
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Karen V. Murphy, J.
Plaintiff moves this court pursuant to CPLR 3211 (b) to strike *532the defenses interposed in defendants’ answer, for summary judgment in favor of plaintiff pursuant to CPLR 3212, and for injunctive relief pursuant to CPLR 6301.
Defendants cross-move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3), (5) and (7) and to permanently enjoin plaintiff from utilizing Mental Hygiene Law § 9.13 as a basis to effectuate the discharge of children under the age of 16 from a state run inpatient facility.
In this action, the plaintiff director of Mental Hygiene Legal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Buechel v. BainNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Allied Chemical v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Rosner v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joseph S. v. HoganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Hirschfeld v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Cymbler v. New York StateDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025