Legal Opinion
Cole v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 13, 2006No. 03-73872PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [73] AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION [74] AS TO LIABILITY BUT RESERVING ISSUES AS TO REMEDIES; i.e., IMPLEMENTATION OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DAMAGES
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This litigation is brought by Plaintiffs, six retirees and one surviving spouse (collectively, the “Retiree Plaintiffs”) and United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”), against the Retiree Plaintiffs’ former employers and current benefits administrator, Rockwell…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leonhardt v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Cole v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Cole v. Meritor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Winnett v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.