United States ex rel. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local Union No. 98 v. Farfield Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KEARNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE
Electrical contractor The Farfield Company moves to dismiss arguing a federal court may not decide whether it misclassified its union electricians because the Department of Labor declined to resolve this worker classification issue which it claims is central to a False Claims Act case. The Farfield Company argues the misclassification claims are "nonjusticiable" without the Department of Labor's determination. We agreed with The Farfield Company as to a need for the Department of Labor to initially review this issue within its expertise. The Plaintiff inexplicably…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Clark v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JD ECKMAN INCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023