Legal Opinion

Rasmuson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 5, 2015No. 2014-5089, 2014-5092, 2014-5107PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Circuit Judge.

In these Rails-to-Trails cases, the Court of Federal Claims found that the plaintiff-landowners were entitled to just compensation for the inverse condemnation of their respective properties. In awarding compensation to the landowners, the Court of Federal Claims determined that an appraiser is not required to take into account the physical remnants of a railroad easement when determining the value of the land before the taking occurred. Because we conclude that an appraiser must consider the value of a landowner’s property before the easement, which in this case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. 564.54 Acres of Monroe and Pike County LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Phipps v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. AGAPION v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API