Legal Opinion
United States v. Wiesen
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided July 10, 2002No. 01-0134/ARPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
2Per curiam
The Government petitions for reconsideration of this Court’s opinion at 56 MJ 172 (2001). In its petition, the Government argues that we (1) improperly shifted the burden of establishing a challenge for cause away from the party making the challenge, contrary to RCM 912(f)(3), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2000 ed.), and (2) overlooked facts about the relationship between the challenged member and his subordinates and misapprehended the operational situation at Fort Stewart at the time of trial.
To be successful on a petition for reconsideration, the…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. WiesenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. DaultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. EastonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. Master Sergeant TIMOTHY B. HENNISArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. ArindainUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.