Legal Opinion
United States v. Easton
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 4, 2012No. 12-0053/ARPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge BAKER
delivered the opinion of the Court.
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial at Fort Stewart, Georgia, convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of missing movement by design, in violation of Article 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 887 (2006). Appellant was sentenced to dismissal and eighteen months of confinement. The convening authority reduced Appellant’s term of confinement to ten months, waived the automatic forfeiture of all pay and allowances for a period of six months, and otherwise approved the adjudged…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. McMurrinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. DanielUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. EastonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.