Legal Opinion

Homer Building & Loan Ass'n v. S. Makransky & Sons, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1936No. Appeal, 352PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit brought by a building and loan association to recover the amount of a stock loan made to one of its members. The case was tried in the municipal court by a judge without a jury and resulted in a judgment for the defendant. In this appeal the plaintiff complains of the refusal of its motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial. We find no error in the action of the court below.

The plaintiff made out a prima facie case by showing the execution and delivery of a stock loan note for $1,200, dated October 28, 1930, payable one day after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strohen v. Franklin Saving Fund & Loan Ass'n ex rel. McKinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Orient Building & Loan Ass'n v. FreudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Early & Lane's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Sullivan & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. Ideal Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Watkins v. Workingmens' Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry Heymann Building & Loan Ass'n v. DenneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Fielis v. Henry H. Edmunds Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API