Legal Opinion

Fielis v. Henry H. Edmunds Building & Loan Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1939No. Appeal, 167Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit in which there are no disputed facts and a pure question of law is raised. The appellant, who gave a notice of her desire to withdraw twenty-five shares of installment stock which she was carrying in the defendant building and loan association, claims that the court below erred in not awarding her a larger sum than the defendant was willing to pay her and has in fact paid to her. After trial and verdict, judgment n. o. v. was entered for defendant. We are in accord with the conclusion of the court below.

On April 6, 1936, the Secretary of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stone v. Schiller Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Appeal of ChristianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. United States Brick Co. v. Middletown Shale Brick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Folk v. State Capital Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Morris Resnick B. & L. Ass'n v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API