Legal Opinion
United States v. Appling
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 12, 1965No. Civ. A. 64-H-370PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraven, Senior District Judge
(by assignment).
This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, Floyd E. Appling and Harold Treybig, to recover penalties assessed against them under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, .'Section 1281 et seq., Title 7 U.S.C.A. Jurisdiction is based by Section 1376, Title 7 U.S.G.A. and Section 1345, Title 28 U.S.C.A. The case was submitted to the Court upon the record stipulated in a pretrial order. Under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, the Congress attempted to solve the problems resulting from the excess…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Ethan Stangland, United States of America v. Max MunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Core Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- 3M Co. (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing) v. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- 3m Company v. Carol M. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Tennessee Burley Tobacco Growers' Association, and Cross-Appellant v. Commodity Credit Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.