Legal Opinion

3M Co. (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing) v. Browner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 4, 1994No. 92-1126PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

This petition for review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s assessment of civil penalties turns on the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2462, the direct descendant of a statute of limitations enacted more than a century and a half ago. There, are three questions. Does § 2462 apply to administrative proceedings? If so, is a proceeding to assess a civil penalty an action for the enforcement of a penalty within § 2462’s meaning? If it is, does § 2462’s five-year period of limitations begin running only when EPA reasonably…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Federal Election Commission v. Larry R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. SEC v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. ['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. AlexanderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API