Legal Opinion
3m Company v. Carol M. Browner
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 9, 1994No. 92-1126PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
17 F.3d 1453
38 ERC 1259, 305 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 62
USLW 2549,
24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,544
3M COMPANY (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING), Petitioner,
v.
Carol M. BROWNER, Administrator of Environmental Protection
Agency and Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents.
No. 92-1126.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Sept. 7, 1993.
Decided March 4, 1994.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Denied May 9, 1994.
Petition for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Douglas L. Wald, Washington, DC, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Kermit Lumber & Pressure Treating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. ReavesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. KearnsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Maggio v. Wisconsin Avenue Psychiatric Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.