Legal Opinion
Scott Timber Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 5, 2011No. 05-708CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
LETTOW, Judge.
This is a post-trial decision on damages in a timber-sale case. The relevant timber-sale contracts pertain to the “Jigsaw,” “White-bird,” and “Pigout” timber areas located in the Umpqua National Forest in Southern Oregon, within Region 6 of the National Forest System. See Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 86 Fed.Cl. 102, 103 (2009). Scott Timber Company (“Scott Timber” or “Scott”) filed suit in this court seeking damages based upon allegations that the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) had wrongfully *688suspended and breached these three timber-sale…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scott Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Redondo Construction Corp. v. Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority (In Re Redondo Construction Corp.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Colonial Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.