Legal Opinion

Joski v. Short

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 21, 1939No. 67PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

The sole question involved is whether, diversity of citizenship and jurisdictional minimum being present, a garnishment proceeding brought in the State courts can be removed to the Federal Court.

Garnishments are usually considered ancillary remedies in aid of a main action. 28 C.J. 17, 18. However, under the statutes of the State of Washington they are distinct suits which partake of the nature of an adversary controversy, under pleadings joining issue and requiring a judgment, to which the statutes relating to change of venue and appeals apply. Remington’s Revised…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Bank v. Turnbull & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. State ex rel. Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Tatum v. GeistWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State ex rel. Stewart & Holmes Drug Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stoll v. Hawkeye Casualty Co. Of Des Moines, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Watkins v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Local No. 2 v. International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Toney v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1939
  5. Moore v. Sentry Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API