Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Royal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before Hon. A. L. Lipscomb.

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by the appellees against the appellant and the city of Palestine to enjoin them from maintaining a sewer by which the sewage of the city of Palestine was emptied into a branch or creek which flowed through the land of appellees and polluted the water. The case was tried by a jury, and upon their verdict judgment was rendered in favor of the appellees that the appellant be enjoined from maintaining the terminal of the sewer on the creek above appellees’ land, and granting him six months in which to comply with the decree.

In the year 1894 the city…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. City of San Antonio v. PizziniTexas Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stein v. Highland Park Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. City of Graham v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Cardwell v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. City of Pittsburg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Baker v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API