Legal Opinion

Marcante v. Hein

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1937No. 1998PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

This proceeding in error was instituted to review the record and judgment of the district court of Lincoln County in a case wherein Henry Hein, doing business under the firm name of Table Supply, was plaintiff and Angelo Molinar and Ernest Molinar were defendants. The action was one in replevin and for damages.

Summarized the facts out of which the litigation arose are these: Hein on the 23rd day of September, 1932, was engaged in the retail grocery and meat business in the town of Kemmerer, Wyoming, and Angelo Molinar and Ernest Molinar were conducting a wholesale grocery…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Tootle v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Lane v. SchillingOregon Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Hofer v. LavenderTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hayes v. GillTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Morriss v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. State v. CantrellWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API