Legal Opinion

Tiranno v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 27, 1984PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs,- in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff was discharged from his position as parts manager for defendant Sears after it decided that he was responsible for alleged inventory shortages. He then commenced this action alleging breach of written and oral employment contracts, defamation, prima facie tort and conspiracy. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted as to the prima facie tort and conspiracy causes of action but was otherwise denied. Special Term should have granted defendants summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Shapiro v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Stillman v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Novosel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gorrill v. Icelandair/FlugleidirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Suter v. Harsco Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ronald G. Jones, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Dunkirk Radiator Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Cynthia Grantham Wright v. Peter J. Cayan, Individually and as President of the State University of New York College of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API