Legal Opinion
People v. Odome
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered February 25, 1988, convicting him of *726robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial by the court’s instructions regarding his failure to testify. However, since no objection was made, this claim is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Autry, 75 NY2d 836). In any event, we find that the court’s charge did not constitute reversible error. The charge was neutral in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. AutryNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. OgleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. GarganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. PierreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CochraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.