People v. Autry
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
In People v Autry, People v Lara and People v Brown, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. In People v Fehr, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed.
Each of these four cases involves a claim by the defendant that the trial court’s instructions to the jurors concerning their duty to draw no adverse inference from the defendant’s failure to testify should have been confined to the bare words of the statute (CPL 300.10 [2]) requiring the court to give such a charge upon defense request, and that the more expansive charge delivered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. McLucasNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by134 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. EveryNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. SadowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. PomalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.