Legal Opinion
Jose Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2014No. 13-55486PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Jose Gomez appeals adverse summary judgment on personal and putative class claims brought pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(l)(A)(iii) (2012). Gomez alleges that the CampbellEwald Company instructed or allowed a third-party vendor to send unsolicited text messages on behalf of the United States Navy, with whom Campbell-Ewald had a marketing contract. Because we conclude that Campbell-Ewald is not entitled to immunity, and because we find no alternate basis upon which to grant its motion for summary…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Arnold Chapman v. First Index, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Jones v. Royal Admin. Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Greg Adkisson v. Jacobs Engineering Group, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Mavrix Photographs, LLC v. Livejournal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.