Legal Opinion

Miller v. Yates

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 1992No. 11176-8-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Laurie Miller sued her landlords, Michael and Sharon Yates, for damages and injunctive relief alleging assault and battery, infliction of emotional distress, trespass and unlawful eviction under the Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973. An arbitrator awarded her $4,802.24 and attorney fees and costs of $6,266.66. The Yateses were awarded $5,150 on their counterclaim based on intentional waste to the premises and $150 in attorney fees. The Yateses requested a trial de novo. A jury awarded Ms. Miller $12,000 and the Yateses $50. The Yateses moved for a new trial on the basis the damage award…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rasor v. Retail Credit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bingaman v. Grays Harbor Community HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Alger v. City of MukilteoWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pritchett v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hoglund v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill v. GTE Directories Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Fergen v. SesteroWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Conrad v. ManorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Conrad Ex Rel. Conrad v. Alderwood ManorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Dexheimer v. CDS, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API