Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Manor

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 19, 2003No. 20931-8-IIIPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is a claim for injuries to and the death of an elderly nursing home patient. The claim resulted in a multimillion dollar jury verdict. On appeal the nursing home challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support liability for one of the injuries — a femur fracture — to the patient. We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support liability. The nursing home also challenges the damage award and the court’s special verdict form, which, it claims, accommodated an improper award of double damages. But the nursing home took no exception to the verdict form at trial and therefore…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Conrad Ex Rel. Conrad v. Alderwood ManorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Harris v. Extendicare Homes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  5. State v. LefflerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API