Fergen v. Sestero
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 “The most critical element of most medical malpractice claims based on negligence ... is the standard of care owed by the doctor to his or her patient.” Watson v. Hockett, 107 Wn.2d 158, 162, 727 P.2d 669 (1986). In order to provide a lay jury with the best possible understanding of this fundamental, yet often confusing, component of legal liability, supplemental standard of care instructions are sometimes used in addition to the basic instructions. One of these supplemental instructions is the exercise of judgment instruction, which reminds juries that if a physician exercises the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Riehl v. Foodmaker, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Reyes v. Yakima Health Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- Paetsch v. Spokane Dermatology Clinic, PSWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Albertson v. Washington ex rel. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- In Re the Detention of Taylor-RoseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.