Gaines-Tabb v. Ici Explosives USA, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of Defendant ICI Explosives U.S.A. Inc. (“ICI”) to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P. 1 As grounds for its motion, Defendant ICI asserts that Plaintiffs have not and cannot allege facts showing that any action or inaction of ICI was the proximate cause of the Plaintiffs’ injuries; that the sole or supervening cause of the Plaintiffs’ injuries was a criminal act committed by terrorists which ICI had no duty to anticipate or prevent; that Plaintiffs have failed to allege facts…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- United States v. Carroll Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Joe James v. Meow Media, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- In Re September 11 LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- PORT AUTHORITY OF NY AND NJ v. Arcadian Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Gray v. DerderianDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.