Legal Opinion
PORT AUTHORITY OF NY AND NJ v. Arcadian Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 19, 1997No. 96-CIV. 1635(WGB)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge.
On February 26,1993, terrorists detonated an explosive device (the “Device”) under the World Trade Center, killing six, injuring many, and causing massive property damage. Alleging that the terrorists used Defendants’ fertilizer products to construct the Device, Plaintiff Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the owner of the World Trade Center, seeks to recover damages from Defendants on theories of negligence and products liability.
Defendants now move to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Court’s jurisdiction is…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Arcadian Corp Dyno Nobel Inc, F/k/a, Ireco Incorporated Hydro Agri North America, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Ebenhoech v. Koppers Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Baldwin v. Housing Authority of City of Camden, NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Nannay v. Rowan CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.