Joseph Amelar, Inc. v. Far East Conference
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Upon a careful review of the voluminous initial decisions of the hearing examiners,1 the report of the Federal Maritime Commission dated March 27, 1964, the Congressional Reports which preceded the enactment in 1961 of subdivision 9 of section 14(b) of the Shipping Act of 1916, as amended,2 the Court concludes that the arbitration clause contained in the dual rate contract between petitioner and respondent is valid and does not deprive the Commission of its jurisdiction.3 The arbitration provision is permissible under section 14(b) of the Act which, after enumerating…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In re the Arbitration between Pasch & Chemoleum Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Gordon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- In re the Arbitration Between Pasch & Chemoleum Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by1 opinion
- Universal American Corporation v. SS Hoegh DrakeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966