Legal Opinion
Universal American Corporation v. SS Hoegh Drake
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 1966No. 65 AD. 1138PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Respondents, in accordance with the provisions of Admiralty Rule No. 58 of the United States Supreme Court, move to dismiss the libel on the ground that the claims alleged therein are time-barred under the provisions of the bills of lading and by the United States Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (49 Stat. 1208 (1936), 46 U.S.C. § 1303(b) (1964)) incorporated into said bills of lading. Suit is brought to recover damage to cargo shipped from New York and delivered in Bombay, India.
There appears to be no genuine issue as to the following material facts. The 87 boxes…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., and Third Party v. United States Lines Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- M. v. M., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- West India Industries, Inc. v. Tradex, Tradex Petroleum ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- American Tobacco Company v. Transport CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1967
- International Drilling Company v. M/V DoriefsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Stone v. DoergeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002