Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Pasch & Chemoleum Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ John L. Flynn, J.
Application is here made in separate proceeding’s commenced by petitioner against each respondent for orders directing that arbitration proceed pursuant to contract entered into by the parties. The issues in each case are identical and accordingly the two applications will be considered together.
A single answer on behalf of both respondents was heretofore filed, and, following oral argument, date was fixed for the exchange and filing of memoranda of law. Respondents thereafter moved for leave to amend their answer and for an extension of the time limited for the filing of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- The Hine v. TrevorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Arbitration Between Schachter (Lester Witte & Co.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Universal American Corporation v. SS Hoegh DrakeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Locke Associates, Inc. v. Foundation for the Support of the United NationsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997
- In re the Arbitration Between Pasch & Chemoleum Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Joseph Amelar, Inc. v. Far East ConferenceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.