Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Camac
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County (Lee Holzman, S.), entered April 4, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from, denied petitioners’ motion for summary judgment to dismiss the objections to probate and to admit the propounded will to probate solely with regard to the objection that the propounded will was the product of undue influence practiced upon the decedent, unanimously reversed, without costs, petitioners’ motion granted, and the objection on the ground of alleged undue influence dismissed.
Decedent began living with one of her two daughters shortly after the death of her husband in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of WaltherNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Children's Aid Society v. . LoveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Rollwagen v. . RollwagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- In Re the Estate of AnnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Cordovi v. KarnbadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of de Heredia RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Estate of CamacNew York Surrogate's Court · 2004
- Kramer v. DanalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kramer v. DanalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.