State Ex Rel. duPont v. Ingram
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice:
This is an appeal from the order of the Superior Court vacating its prior mandate that the defendants in this mandamus action “provide appropriate separate work, custody, training and treatment facilities for youthful offenders within the meaning of 11 Del.C. § 6526(a)”. See opinion below at 294 A.2d 839 for a statement of the facts and contentions.
We assume, without deciding, the' standing of the plaintiffs to pursue the nature and extent of relief here sought. * We do this in view of the importance of the questions presented and the conclusions reached.
The plaintiffs make…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hartung v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Commonwealth v. KalckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Hartung v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. PerkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bartley v. HoldenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
- State v. NicholsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975