Legal Opinion
Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 9, 2017No. Case No. 15-cv-04073-EJDPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendants AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone and Bo-dymedia, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants” or “Jawbone”) motion for judgment on the pleadings that U.S. Patent Nos. 9,026,053 (the “’053 patent”), 9,106,307 (the “’307 patent”), and 9,048,923 (the “’923 patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”) are invalid for failure to claim patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Dkt. No. 88. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Jawbone’s motion.
I.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Jose Chavez v. James ZiglarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Location Based Servs., LLC v. Niantic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Ficep Corporation v. Peddinghaus CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- WSOU Investments, LLC v. Netgear, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022