Legal Opinion

Ficep Corporation v. Peddinghaus Corporation

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 26, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01994Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FICEP CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-1994-RGA ) PEDDINGHAUS CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION In this patent action filed by Plaintiff Ficep Corporation (“Ficep” or “Plaintiff”) against Defendant Peddinghaus Corporation (“Peddinghaus” or “Defendant”), presently pending before the Court is Peddinghaus’s motion to dismiss Ficep’s operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (D.I. 15) For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Sincavage v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API