Legal Opinion

Abram v. City of Avon Lake

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2008No. 08CA009395PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

{¶ 1} Residential landowners sued the city of Avon Lake over special assessments levied by the city to fund the construction of sidewalks. Anthony and Nancy Abram and Alberta Hassel have argued that the trial court incorrectly granted summary judgment to the city because there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding (1) whether the sidewalk resulted in any special benefit for the landowners, (2) whether the city was required to convene an equalization board to hear the landowners’ complaints, and (3) whether the city breached a duty to pursue federal and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Smith v. PadgettOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Schiff v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. McKelveyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Wolfe v. City of AvonOhio Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Had Enterprises v. GallowayOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API