Legal Opinion

La Bomboniera, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 18, 1949No. 53404; protest 123066-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as “confectionery flowers,” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 60 percent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1518 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, so far as pertinent, read as follows:

* * * artificial or ornamental fruits, vegetables, grasses, grains, leaves, flowers, stems, or parts thereof, when composed wholly or in chief value .of yarns, threads, filaments, tinsel wire, lame, bullions, metal threads, beads, bugles, *135spangles, or rayon or other synthetic textile, 90 per centum ad…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. United States v. SearsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Shallus Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. DieckerhoffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Waubert, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API