Legal Opinion

Shallus Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 11, 1925No. 2471PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Two protests are involved in this case.

The imported articles crudely resemble, in form and coloring, natural fruits, such as oranges, pears, apples, lemons, etc. Each article is composed of soap covered with a very thin coating of paraffin.

The collector classified the importations as artificial fruits under paragraph 1419 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which provides, among other things, for—

artificial or ornamental fruits * * * of whatever material composed, not specially provided for, 60 per centum ad valorem; * * *

The importer claims classification as toilet soap under paragraph 82 of the act,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SearsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. United States v. DieckerhoffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. Wolff & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Morris, Mann & Reilly Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marshall Field & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  2. Altman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. La Bomboniera, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  4. Coro, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. Protests 23669-K of MayerUnited States Customs Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API