Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Smith Material Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1980No. 78-1140PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

This diversity case, Texas law controlling, concerns a collision between a truck and a train. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (“Southern Pacific”) and the National Railroad Passenger Corp. (“Amtrak”), acting as a single entity, sued Smith Material Corp. (“Smith”) for damages to its train tracks and cars when a truck driven by a Smith employee collided with the train at a railroad crossing. Smith counterclaimed for damages to its truck. The jury apportioned fault, finding Smith responsible for 75 per cent of the negligence proximately causing the collision, Amtrak…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Aerojet-General Corp. v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Strakos v. GehringTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Nora Faye Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. C. A. Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Barry Brister and Karen Brister, Cross-Appellees v. A.W.I., Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Morris A. Hicks, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Dixon v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API